themadjw
Junior Member
Posts: 77
Likes: 4
|
Post by themadjw on May 23, 2021 14:57:57 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by argy on Jun 7, 2021 7:45:19 GMT -5
This is where your lack of English comprehension shows.
Those two statements are not the same. And anyone proficient in kindergarten English would know it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 7, 2021 9:39:21 GMT -5
This is where your lack of English comprehension shows.
Those two statements are not the same. And anyone proficient in kindergarten English would know it.
And YOU complain about insults as you are a major hurler, still not articulate in the language
|
|
|
Post by Bogus0Pomp on Jun 7, 2021 10:29:59 GMT -5
Argy is correct about your lack of comprehension of English, Wale. The statements
'I see no evidence of God' and
'I believe that PRESENTLY God doesn't exit' ARE NOT the same. That is, contrary to the clear implication of your statement, they DO NOT say the same thing.
By the way, I find it rather amusingly ironic that you, who habitually uses the word "butt" where the correct word is "but," would say of another that they are not articulate in the language.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 7, 2021 12:10:24 GMT -5
Argy is correct about your lack of comprehension of English, Wale. The statements
'I see no evidence of God' and
'I believe that PRESENTLY God doesn't exit' ARE NOT the same. That is, contrary to the clear implication of your statement, they DO NOT say the same thing.
By the way, I find it rather amusingly ironic that you, who habitually uses the word "butt" where the correct word is "but," would say of another that they are not articulate in the language. They are the same because when one doesn't see evidence of something , one doesn't believe that something until evidence is presented. Well, bogus, take a closer look as to when I use BUTT and with whom! Articulation and spelling are two DIFFERENT things and aren't synonymous.
|
|
|
Post by Bogus0Pomp on Jun 7, 2021 12:27:57 GMT -5
Wale, it is only your wish that those statements are equivalent, the same, based solely upon YOUR assumption, that assumption being that when one says that they don't see evidence of the existence of something, that they ALSO believe that something does not exist. That assumption is baseless without any further statements besides 'I don't see evidence that X exists.'
As for "articulation" vs. "spelling," correct spelling, actually word choice in this instance, would be one of the requirements of articulating the language well.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 7, 2021 13:42:39 GMT -5
Wale, it is only your wish that those statements are equivalent, the same, based solely upon YOUR assumption, that assumption being that when one says that they don't see evidence of the existence of something, that they ALSO believe that something does not exist. That assumption is baseless without any further statements besides 'I don't see evidence that X exists.'
As for "articulation" vs. "spelling," correct spelling, actually word choice in this instance, would be one of the requirements of articulating the language well. 1- If I don't see evidence and Ive made other statements basically disregarding what I don't see then it is the same thing. Maybe stop jumping into conversations in midpoint and go over the context before you comment.
2- word choice IS articulation, correct Spelling is NOT articulation, incorrect
|
|
|
Post by Bogus0Pomp on Jun 7, 2021 18:08:46 GMT -5
1- Is nothing more than contrived drivel and an impotent demand.
2- Is INCORRECT. BOTH word choice and spelling are elements of articulation.
By the way, Wale, your use of the incorrect "butt" instead of the correct "but" IS incorrect WORD CHOICE It is NOT incorrect spelling.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 7, 2021 19:04:58 GMT -5
1- Is nothing more than contrived drivel and an impotent demand.
2- Is INCORRECT. BOTH word choice and spelling are elements of articulation.
By the way, Wale, your use of the incorrect "butt" instead of the correct "but" IS incorrect WORD CHOICE It is NOT incorrect spelling. 1- YOUR incorrect Opinion 2- Incorrect
The word choice is correct because I CHOSE it.
|
|
|
Post by Bogus0Pomp on Jun 7, 2021 19:20:46 GMT -5
Wale is possessed of an utterly astounding amount of hubris for one who is ever bereft of knowledge.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 7, 2021 19:43:25 GMT -5
Wale is possessed of an utterly astounding amount of hubris for one who is ever bereft of knowledge. No, I am possessed of an amazing amount of knowledge, says one who isnt
|
|
|
Post by Bogus0Pomp on Jun 7, 2021 20:13:57 GMT -5
LOL Wale, you have just literally said that you are not possessed of an "amazing amount of knowledge."
|
|
|
Post by argy on Jun 7, 2021 22:18:03 GMT -5
Argy is correct about your lack of comprehension of English, Wale. The statements
'I see no evidence of God' and
'I believe that PRESENTLY God doesn't exit' ARE NOT the same. That is, contrary to the clear implication of your statement, they DO NOT say the same thing.
By the way, I find it rather amusingly ironic that you, who habitually uses the word "butt" where the correct word is "but," would say of another that they are not articulate in the language. They are the same because when one doesn't see evidence of something , one doesn't believe that something until evidence is presented. Well, bogus, take a closer look as to when I use BUTT and with whom! Articulation and spelling are two DIFFERENT things and aren't synonymous.
You've clearly demonstrated a lack of comprehension on this simple thing. It is obvious why you fail to grasp more complicated stuff.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 7, 2021 22:32:49 GMT -5
They are the same because when one doesn't see evidence of something , one doesn't believe that something until evidence is presented. Well, bogus, take a closer look as to when I use BUTT and with whom! Articulation and spelling are two DIFFERENT things and aren't synonymous.
You've clearly demonstrated a lack of comprehension on this simple thing. It is obvious why you fail to grasp more complicated stuff.
Not at all. If Ive told you in other posts, I don't accept the existence of goats and later tell you I don't see evidence of goats, Ive pretty much covered it.
|
|
|
Post by argy on Jun 8, 2021 6:47:54 GMT -5
You've clearly demonstrated a lack of comprehension on this simple thing. It is obvious why you fail to grasp more complicated stuff.
Not at all. If Ive told you in other posts, I don't accept the existence of goats and later tell you I don't see evidence of goats, Ive pretty much covered it.
This is getting tedius. Do you understand the difference between "I am unconvinced a god exists" and "I am certain god does not exist"?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 8, 2021 9:27:57 GMT -5
Not at all. If Ive told you in other posts, I don't accept the existence of goats and later tell you I don't see evidence of goats, Ive pretty much covered it.
This is getting tedius. Do you understand the difference between "I am unconvinced a god exists" and "I am certain god does not exist"?
In other posts you've expressly stated God doesn't exist, coupled with you are unconvinced, yes its the same thing
|
|