The Constitution does NOT recognize the abhorrent behavior of homosexuality as a legally protected distinction and never has. When it was adopted and ratified, homosexuality NEVER was even a consideration.
What legal treatments are homosexuals requesting that are not afforded to heterosexuals?
we have been over this and you are ASKING AGAIN TO HAVE A DIFFERENT ANSWER HOPEFULLY YOUR WAY TUBBYTUBA.
They want to be able to marry to use marriage as a legttimizer for society so society doesn't notice their abnormality
I can't see any, myself, but maybe you know something I don't. Can you name one or two so I can get the gist of what you're talking about?
Done that already in previous posts go back
That sounds like you think equality is oppressing you.
Its not equality dumbass, its forcing society to accept abnormality as normal. Is there something dysfunctional about loving a man?
YES already documented. If so, what does your wife think?
THAT once again has no bearing on their abnormality
By the way, the push for same sex marriage is hardly "clandestine", it's right out there in public view.
yes.
Ah, now you're getting it! That's a good thing.
No that's a VERY bad thing because they then use a legitimate institution to hide their abnormality
The same can be said of slavery, no?
no slaves were normal people who were subjugated.And women - who only managed to earn the right to vote in the last hundred years.
And being a woman is normal whereas homosexuals are abnormal. The simple fact is that your society has evolved beyond the narrow views that were prevalent at the time your constitution was written.
Historically, culturally, biblically , biologically and by many others standards, HOMOSEXUALITY has been, and STILL is,
considered to be a deviation of normal.
Are you saying your constitution distinguishes against the handicapped - people with birth defects, the blind, the deaf, people with mongolism or red hair?
NONE of those are pushing for extra categories and classifications for them to obtain extra rights.
What classification are you talking about? And who is asserting it?
Paul MacEvoy from Pittsburgh
So you agree that laws against homosexuality should be repealed? It should not be illegal? They should be treated equally?
No I don't and why do you repeat that childish tactic over and over?
Should they have the right to vote? Yes. Work in the police force questionable, fight for your country in the armed services? Absolutely not
If you think society as a whole thinks homosexuality is a an abomination then you need your social radar recalibrated. It is quite clear that society's attitude to homosexuality has changed spectacularly quickly - it's been less than a generation. If they haven't done so already, every civilised country is moving towards giving homosexuals equal rights to heterosexuals. To their detriment
I think that's your problem. You look like an old man shouting at clouds. The world has passed you by and you don't know it yet.
Not at all because absolutes are not evolutionary and homosexuality is an affront to those.
Things have changed for the worse. Get over it. No , not simply because YOU say so Move on.
No , not simply because YOU say so