|
Post by skrumpie on Nov 4, 2019 9:38:41 GMT -5
I give you the inimitable Kurt Schlichter:
Trump Is Derailing The Elite’s Gravy Train
Like the garbage French elite of long ago, our American garbage elite of today has learned nothing and forgotten nothing. For four years, it has been focused entirely on deep sixing Donald Trump for his unforgivable crime of demanding that our ruling caste be held accountable for its legacy of failure. Instead of focusing on not being terrible at their job of running America’s institutions, our elitists have decided that the real problem is us Normals being angry about how they are terrible at their job of running America’s institutions. So, let’s imagine that they finally vanquish Trump, though every time they come up against him they end up dragging themselves home like Ned Beatty after a particularly tough canoe trip.
What happens then?
What happens then is that it’s back to business as usual, and for decades, business as usual for our garbage elite has not merely been running our institutions badly but pillaging and looting our country for power, prestige and cash.
The difference is that in the future they will be much more careful to ensure that no one who is not in on the scam will ever again come anywhere near the levers of power. You can already see it – the demands that we defer to the bureaucrats they own, the attacks on the idea of free expression, and the campaign to disarm us. Their objective is no more Trumps, just an endless line of progressive would-be Maduros with the march toward despair occasionally put on pause for a term by some Fredocon Republican who hates us Normals just as much as the Dems, but won’t admit it until after he’s out of office.
Our garbage elite talks a good game about its service and moral superiority, but if our betters were actually better than us, we would not be having this national conversation about how awful they are.
The fact is that what they want to do is go back to the way it was before Trump, back to 2015, aka the year 1 BT – Before Trump. Back then, progressive Democrats got their bizarre social pathologies normalized. Moderate Democrats got money, power and an open season on the local talent. Corporate types represented largely by squishy Republicans got globalism and the ability to ship our jobs out and import Third World serfs in. And the fake conservatives of Conservative, Inc., got to cash in without the necessity of actually conserving anything.
The only people that the old system didn’t work for were the American people.
It’s important to remember and to always remind yourself, that everything our elite says about its motives and morals is a lie and a scam. Take the whole #MeToo thing. This was supposed to be some sort of revolutionary rebellion against the sexual exploitation of the powerless by the powerful. It’s not, and never was. Rather, it’s simply an internal power struggle among and within the elites to reallocate power among snooty people who don’t give a damn about you or me.
The fall of Harvey Weinstein or Matt Lauer or any of the other bigwigs means nothing to the conservative single mom being exploited by the Democrat donors who own Walmart. It was actually striving female members of the elite – actresses, models, media figures, executives – leveraging the monstrosity of the creeps at the top to increase their own power within the elite. Do you see any of these #MeToo heroines, now that they have taken their scalps, helping their non-elite sisters out in Gun-Jesusland? Yeah, right. They are lining up with the rest of their elite pals to shaft us.
What you do see is excuses. They excuse Bill Clinton and his enabler Felonia Milhous von Pantsuit. They excuse Gropey Joe. They are in the process of excusing Katie Hill, whose naked hairbrush photo has ensured that none of us will ever sit on a hotel room chair again. Why no outrage? Why no concern? Because taking out Stumbles McMyturn or Hoover’s Dad or Congresswoman Every Man’s Lesbian Fantasy Destroyer does not help the faction of the elite that benefited from #MeToo. That would help us, but not the elite. Throuple Gal was exposed by Townhall’s peppery sister site Redstate, not the mainstream media, and the mainstream media is horrified – not by her furniture defilement but that word of it got through the gate they yearn to keep.
The simple fact is that they desperately want Trump out so they can return to the good old days of winks, nods, and payoffs.
Look at the Biden Family Crime Syndicate and the antics of the junior capo of the Cosa Nose Candy. In what universe is it A-OK that the crack-fueled Johnny Appleseed of paternity suits that is Joe’s snortunate son was cashing in on $50K a month in sweet, sweet Ukrainian gas gold just weeks after Ensign Biden got booted because he tooted? And then there’s riding on Air Force Two to the NBA’s favorite dictatorship for some commie ducats. Now there are even some Romanian shenanigans too – is there a single country on earth that Totally-Not-Senile Joe didn’t shake down for the benefit of his daughter-in-law’s second hubby?
But our garbage elite’s garbage media seems amazingly uninterested in all this – it’s fascinated by the timing of a situation room snap after Trump unleashed the Army’s Delta Force on al-Baghdadi and by dog medal memes, but the Veep’s boy’s bag-mannery is not merely of no interest but is something they close their fussy phalanx ranks around to protect. Keep in mind, the premise underlying the whole star chamber impeachment festival of onanism is that Donald Trump, America’s chief law enforcement officer, was somehow wrong and bad and double-plus ungood because he allegedly asked the Ukrainians, “Hey, what’s the dealio with the Columbia Kid’s pay-offs?”
In a non-bizarro political universe, the proper reaction to the Prezzy demanding, “You best fork over the evidence on these manifestly corrupt antics involving the Vice-President of the United States or we’re cutting you off from the American taxpayers’ feeding trough,” would be, “Hell to the yeah, four more years! Four more years!’
But it’s not, because the elite likes its sexual abuse and its foreign cash and its total lack of accountability to us, the Normals, the people who are supposed to be the ones that our elite is working for. The elite has not learned its lesson. It has not admitted that it sucks and resolved to stop sucking.
Instead, it has doubled down. And if it gets power again, it will act to solve what it sees as the most urgent problem facing America – the fact that we the people have the ability to reject the elite’s utter incompetence and surpassing greed and elect someone with a mandate to burn down the whole rotten edifice.
If the elitists get power again, they are never letting go of it, not without a fight. And now, doesn’t the elite’s obsessive fixation on shutting down conservative dissent, eliminating competing institutions (like religious entities), and disarming law-abiding Americans make a lot more sense?
townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2019/11/04/trump-is-derailing-the-elites-gravy-train-n2555787
|
|
|
Post by cathymv722 on Nov 7, 2019 11:47:07 GMT -5
and this is why the leftists despise Trump... and this is why I love him!!
|
|
|
Post by pepper on Nov 7, 2019 16:59:00 GMT -5
The left hated Trump before he was even elected...19 minutes after he was declared winner, the leftist sent out an email declaring the impeachment process already started..
He embarrassed the hell out of the left and they just can't accept that they were shown for the liars and the hate filled people they are.
|
|
|
Post by katie5445 on Nov 9, 2019 2:19:57 GMT -5
You really think republicans are happy with nutcase Trump? He will embarrass the left, when he can put two sentences together and quit with the really really great, really really big, really really perfect. The guy is as thick as two planks.
|
|
|
Post by skrumpie on Nov 9, 2019 8:57:53 GMT -5
You do realize that socialists have been using the same rhetorical tactics against conservatives for as long as we have been alive, right, Katie? They are all dumb. They all want to be a dictator or a king. They all 'hate', etc.
Democrats Tried to Impeach Every Elected GOP President Since Eisenhower
No matter how well an elected Republican president performs in office, ever since the Dwight D. Eisenhower administration, Democrats have demanded that the election results be reversed.
Two weeks before the 2016 election, Hillary Clinton tweeted, “Donald Trump refused to say that he’d respect the results of this election. By doing that, he’s threatening our democracy.”
As a Democrat she should know something about not respecting election results.
Since Jan. 20, 1961, when Eisenhower left office, Democrats have introduced impeachment articles against every single elected Republican president.
Eisenhower was succeeded in office by John F. Kennedy. After his assassination 33 months later, Lyndon B. Johnson was sworn in as president and re-elected in 1964. Neither Kennedy nor Johnson was subject to impeachment inquiries.
Richard M. Nixon entered the White House on Jan. 20, 1969, and was re-elected in 1972. In October 1973, the House Judiciary Committee began an impeachment inquiry stemming from the Watergate scandal. Although he had no personal knowledge or role in the events that led to the scandal, he allegedly took steps to cover up the details.
After nearly nine months of investigation and hearings, Nixon resigned from office on August 9, 1974.
He was succeeded by Gerald R. Ford. Although Ford was never the subject of an impeachment investigation, he was neither elected to the presidency nor even the vice presidency.
Ronald Reagan was the next elected Republican president.
In March 1987, halfway through Reagan’s second term, Rep. Henry Gonzales, D-Texas, introduced articles of impeachment based on the Iran-Contra scandal. The effort failed and Reagan’s vice president, George H. W. Bush, was next elected president.
On January 16, 1991, halfway through his term, Rep. Henry Gonzales (yes, the same one) introduced impeachment articles against Bush for initiating Operation Desert Storm. Its purpose was to drive Iraqi forces out of Kuwait, and it lasted slightly more than six months.
The impeachment articles were submitted to the House Judiciary Committee, where they were struck down. Gonzales made another stab at it later and that one also failed.
Bush’s son, George W. Bush, often referred to as Bush-43, faced several impeachment probes, the most significant one brought by Democratic Reps. Dennis Kucinich of Ohio and Robert Wexler of Florida. They jointly introduced 35 articles of impeachment six months before the end of Bush’s second term.
By a 251-166 floor vote, they were referred to the House Judiciary Committee where they gathered dust.
From the moment Donald Trump was elected president, the word “impeach” has been on the lips of many, if not most, Democrats, and for a laundry list of reasons. They include violation of the Emoluments Clause, collusion with Russia, obstruction of justice, and secret dealings with Ukraine.
Within days of Trump’s inauguration, Mark Zaid, attorney for an alleged Trump whistleblower, tweeted, “#coup has started. First of many steps. #rebellion. #impeachment will follow ultimately. #lawyers”
It didn’t take long. Less than six months later Democratic Reps. Al Green of Texas and Brad Sherman of California introduced H. Res. 438, which was tabled. It only escalated from there.
So how did these beleaguered GOP heads of state do?
Nixon established the Environmental Protection Agency, reintroduced relations with China, and worked to achieve “peace with honor” in Vietnam after the Johnson administration’s escalation of hostilities there.
One of Reagan’s first acts was to bring home the 198 U.S. hostages taken by Iran during the Carter administration. He then cut domestic discretionary spending, cut taxes, and increased the military budget. He maintained pressure on the Soviet Union in an effort to put an end to the Cold War, which occurred shortly after he left office.
Domestically, Bush-41 pushed the passage of the landmark Americans with Disabilities Act (the ADA); his successful prosecution of the war to liberate Kuwait from Iraq was his greatest foreign policy achievement.
His eldest son, Bush-43, signed into law broad tax cuts, the Patriot Act, the No Child Left Behind Act, the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act, Medicare prescription drug benefits for seniors, and funding for the AIDS relief program.
Less than three years in office, Trump has created nearly 4 million jobs and dropped unemployment to a 49-year low. He pushed for massive tax cuts, lifted nearly 3.9 million people off food stamps, and economic growth hit 4.2 percent during the last quarter.
For nearly 60 years Democrats have dishonored the will of the people through attempts to overthrow the elections of GOP presidents. And it didn’t matter what they may have accomplished or by what margin they may have won (Reagan took 49 of the 50 states in his mega-landslide re-election).
Though not her intention, Clinton may have said it best: Democrats refuse to "respect the results" of elections — each and every time.
www.newsmax.com/michaeldorstewitz/democrats-impeachment-nixon-reagan/2019/11/08/id/940786/
|
|
|
Post by katie5445 on Nov 13, 2019 20:01:20 GMT -5
I remember the birther start as being Jerome Corsi and Orly Taitz who took it across the US court system and failed. Trump picked it up knowing it was a lie to pull the birther voters in, he knew he was going to run. The phony bullshit, I sent an investigator to Hawaii, to finally admitting, nevermind. Referring to "black fuck" to much of a racist label, I'd use zebra fuck.....the fat shit, nappy haired, Mozilla, c'mon you gotta be better than that! How do I get around the fact that brown, black persons do horrible things through decades to their skin and hair, to be like us. I find that horribly sad, disgusting and something way out of order that they will "fit in" if they are lighter skinned or have straight hair. That is our problem, not theirs, to put that on another person who was born here, that works, that pays taxes, that marries, has children, grandchildren, why?
|
|
|
Post by pepper on Nov 13, 2019 23:12:02 GMT -5
So name calling is ok, as long as you arent calling a black person names? Is that what you are saying? You have called Trump many names and none of them were any better than those you claim Trump called Obama. So, is that the new democrat claim...It is fine to call a white person names, but don't you dare call a black person names???
|
|
|
Post by katie5445 on Nov 14, 2019 0:55:30 GMT -5
I haven't called Trump any names that weren't true. I have never centered on his race afterall I am white........, other than he is orange.............and he is.
|
|
|
Post by skrumpie on Nov 14, 2019 9:09:03 GMT -5
I remember the birther start as being Jerome Corsi and Orly Taitz who took it across the US court system and failed. Trump picked it up knowing it was a lie to pull the birther voters in, he knew he was going to run. The phony bullshit, I sent an investigator to Hawaii, to finally admitting, nevermind. Referring to "black fuck" to much of a racist label, I'd use zebra fuck.....the fat shit, nappy haired, Mozilla, c'mon you gotta be better than that! How do I get around the fact that brown, black persons do horrible things through decades to their skin and hair, to be like us. I find that horribly sad, disgusting and something way out of order that they will "fit in" if they are lighter skinned or have straight hair. That is our problem, not theirs, to put that on another person who was born here, that works, that pays taxes, that marries, has children, grandchildren, why? Hillary's campaign started it, Katie.
|
|
|
Post by katie5445 on Nov 16, 2019 21:13:01 GMT -5
You mean Hillary who has a child sex trade business in a pizza parlor basement? Or maybe the rumour Rove started on the McCain family regarding their adopted daughter and brought up Cindy McCains' addiction?
|
|
|
Post by katie5445 on Nov 16, 2019 21:22:30 GMT -5
So name calling is ok, as long as you arent calling a black person names? Is that what you are saying? You have called Trump many names and none of them were any better than those you claim Trump called Obama. So, is that the new democrat claim...It is fine to call a white person names, but don't you dare call a black person names??? It has nothing to do with black persons, that was out of order and reaching for any straw. We can go Native American, Japanese, Hispanic and so on if you choose..........and after all I am white and I don't accept name calling on my race either! The names I call Trump are true, he is a cheater, he is a liar and he hasn't got a clue what he is doing, no brainer. Obama was born in Hawaii, he is not Muslim, he is not a terrorist. Try keeping it in reality. That you hated Obama policies is one thing, what the right did personally, disgusting, a lie and started the division. I have said before I will never understand how in 2016 will so many credible persons who represented the republican party ended up with Trump. I also don't understand as a dem at the same time I had a choice of Bernie, Hillary and McMullin whose first name I can't even remember. I kept waiting and waiting and that was it.
|
|
|
Post by katie5445 on Nov 16, 2019 21:31:25 GMT -5
I also think you all and not unlike dems as well do wish for the demise or a serious weakness in the other party. I wish both parties to be strong, fair, capable, healthy, by the founding fathers it is who we are, Jefferson vs. Adams that however does not mean govt. should stop or that persons lie and scheme.
|
|
|
Post by pepper on Nov 17, 2019 14:12:41 GMT -5
I find that you and your party find anything at all acceptable if it suits your agendas....But, you claim you are right and the names you find are fitting and true...All you know is what you have been told..nothing more, nothing less. You refuse to look at the things Trump and the right as done to help this country, you refuse to even consider the possibility that you are dead wrong, and that your own party is what drives you down the path of hate and disfunction since 2016. Tell me one thing the left has done for this country since their only interest has been instilling hate into it's members and anyone else they can...One constructive, honest, beneficial, and advantage to the citizens, the country, or it's military your party has done since 2016.....I have a list of the things Trump has done...wanna try to compare...????
|
|
|
Post by katie5445 on Nov 19, 2019 19:12:53 GMT -5
I find nothing untowards to this country acceptable, I am not a 'lover' of any politician, I embrace no one person as if they are special, what they are is under our employ. We do not know them, they are not members of our family or our friends. I wouldn't have any politicians name scrolled across my chest on a t-shirt under any circumstances.
|
|
|
Post by katie5445 on Nov 19, 2019 19:15:01 GMT -5
What Trump has done, hello rabbit hole and the right wing.
|
|
|
Post by oldarmybear on Nov 23, 2019 20:17:38 GMT -5
What Trump has done, hello rabbit hole and the right wing. Here ya go, Katie:
The Most Comprehensive List of President Trump’s Accomplishments
•Left anti-American globalist agreements which would have reduced America to a vassal state of the UN, including the UN Population Fund, Global Compact on Migration, Paris climate agreement, UNESCO, the United Nations Human Rights Council, Global Compact for Refugees, the Iran nuclear deal, the Universal Postal Union, and taking a tough stance against the International Criminal Court. •Reversed the Obama Administration’s Pro-Communist Cuba policy. •Recognized Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and moved the US Embassy there. •Defeated ISIS. •Taking an increasingly tough stance with China, criticizing South Africa’s anti-white (i.e... •... (more items)
The Most Comprehensive List of President Trump’s Accomplishme…
www.halseynews.com/2019/01/05/the-most-comprehensive-list-of-president-trumps-accomplish….
this article was dated Jan 2019 I am sure there have been other accomplishments that need to be added.
|
|